Printed in Caribbean Week, August 3, 1996
n 1 July, Magistrate
Haynes Blackman rejected defence objections to the extradition proceedings against
Noel Heath, Glenroy Matthew and Charles Miller. The U.S. Government will begin
presenting evidence on 19 August to support its "Conspiracy to Traffick
in Cocaine" charges. Many sources have identified the three defendants
as high-level drug dealers over a number of years. They have faced charges in
several related cases without being convicted. The case has drawn much attention
on St. Kitts, which has been plagued by drug-related crime in recent years.
The three men were arrested on provisional warrants of arrest by local police
on May 29. Their vehicles were impounded along with documents and other
property in their homes. They were each released on $25,000 bail the following
day. Their arrests were immediately turned into a political football by
the opposition Peoples Action Movement (PAM) which accused the Labour Government
of having strong ties to the defendants. Labour leaders responded by recounting
that the drug problem in St. Kitts arose during PAM's 15 years in power
and pointed to PAM's impotence at stopping its growth.
At a June 10 hearing the prosecution seemed disorganized, with Attorney
General Delano Bart representing the U.S. Government. His presence drew
forceful condemnations by defence attorney Dr. Henry Browne who called it
"offensive to the Constitution." The prosecution's effort to have
bail revoked for "trying to intimidate potential witnesses" was
unsuccessful.
When court resumed on June 25 the high-powered defence team, led by Browne
and Kenneth Foster, QC from St. Lucia, raised objections to the hearing
proceeding. Dr. Browne argued there was no valid treaty in existence between
St. Kitts-Nevis and the United States, that the Order to Proceed signed
by Prime Minister Dr. Denzil Douglas should have come from the Governor
General and that the Provisional Arrest didn't contain sufficient evidence.
Retired Barbadian Judge Frederick Smith, QC represented the U.S. Government
and responded to the objections.
Court continued all that week, with a heavy police presence around the courthouse.
The immediate area was cordoned off from every direction with yellow police
ribbon reading "Do Not Cross" and staffed by police. Journalists
were prevented from taking photographs in the area and machine gun-armed
police were visible. People who wanted to attend the hearing were questioned
about "their business with the court." It was unclear what criteria
police were using to determine who could enter.
Leaflets have been circulated in Basseterre condemning the United States
for seeking to impose its will on little St. Kitts. One included leaked
excerpts from sworn testimony in the case. Its reference to the OJ Simpson
trial: "Mark Fuhrman did not succeed at home! Should `he' succeed here?"
attempted to bring the issue of racism into the controversy. Graffiti reading
"DEA Go Home," "FBI Out" and "Take Life" has
appeared in various places.
Reading the public response to the whole affair is difficult, but there
are at least three reactions: 1) those who believe the defendants are guilty
and welcome the assistance of the U.S. to fight drug trafficking, 2) people
who support the defendants and 3) those who don't take a position on the
guilt of the defendants, but believe that St. Kitts should not cooperate
with the U.S. as it tries to act as "world policeman".