Excerpts of my testimony at trial for refusing
to register for the draft. Syracuse, NY, January 1985.
"Good morning. I am probably as nervous as you are, since this is relatively
new to me, also.
Basically, during the trial I will be trying to show you through witnesses
and my own testimony that my decision not to register was not willful in
a legal sense, and the testimony that I present, or the witnesses and my
own testimony, will explain why this is so.
I hope that you will listen to all of my testimony, as well as the government's
testimony; that you will do so with an open mind, and that you will think
of the ideas expressed; some of them aren't very conventional ideas and
may be new to you, so it may take a little thinking to let them settle in.
Please give them the time to do so and consider their relevance to this
case.
I will be representing myself throughout the trial, and I received legal
assistance from a variety of people and I feel competent to represent myself.
I choose to represent myself because I believe it is important for all of
us to take control of our own lives and to take responsibility for our actions
and the consequences of those actions. Representing myself is just a part
of that process for me.
I think it is somewhat of a coincidence as I am in court today, the United
States and Soviet Union are sitting down for peace talks, the first peace
talks in approximately a year and-a-half. I hope for success in both instances.
MR. PAVONE: Excuse me, Mr. Mager. I share Mr. Mager's hope of the success
of those peace talks, your Honor, but I object to this as being irrelevant.
THE COURT: You may continue, Mr. Mager.
ME: Thank you. I expect that you will listen to me and think about what
I say, and come back with a verdict that seems to make sense to you.
In terms of what Mr. Pavone said about motive and intent, I think that motive
in and of itself may not change the law, but I think that motive does have
an important bearing on intent; and, thus, I ask that you please do listen
to the motives I express and how they affect[ed] my intent and state of
mind when I made these decisions. Thank you."
"...this testimony relates to the willfulness element of my refusal
to register. In refusing to register, I was affirming my belief in the responsibility
of individual citizens to prevent war, as stated in the Nuremberg Accords;
rather than simply violating the Military Selective Service Act.
I believe that my duty to register is negated by my belief that the U.S.
Government is involved in violations of International Law in regards to
its policies with Nicaragua. Specifically, the U.S. has supported an army
attempting to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, and has mined the harbors
of Nicaragua. These are violations of International Law, and... my belief
is that, indeed, I have an obligation to uphold international law based
on Principles VI and VII of the Nuremberg Accords, which was initiated by
the United States following World War II. That I have an obligation not
to participate in, `Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of war,'
in violation of International Treaty Accords and Agreements, and that this
is true even if in order to uphold those agreements, that I need to break
the laws of my own country.
In essence, I am arguing that by registering I am participating in the uses
which the U.S. Government has chosen for its military force. I think that
one of the reasons I have to believe this is that the case I tried to ask
the witness about earlier, called Rostker vs. Goldberg, is a case where
someone said that draft registration was unconstitutional because it only
required men to register, and not women; and there are laws which protect
[against] discrimination based on gender. As part of the ruling in that
case the Judge said, because it was a Supreme Court case, `Of course, registration
is not an end in itself in the civilian world, but rather the first step
in the induction process into the military.'
So, the registration process is the first step in that military process
which, whose end result right now has been violations of International Law
in Nicaragua; and I have a reasonable good-faith belief that based on Article
VI of the Constitution, which says that all treaties are part of the supreme
law of the land, that I have a responsibility not to register in order to
not be in complicity with the U.S. violations of International law."
"I believe that the government's ability to wage wars around the world
depends on the cooperation of the people they expect to do the fighting
for them. Therefore, I will not give the government the power to tell me
to kill other people or to decide if my reasons for not wanting to kill
other people are acceptable. I cannot see a situation in which I would feel
comfortable killing another person.
I also see my actions in a social context. Wars have caused, and continue
to cause untold death and destruction in our world. Life goes on with military
force being the accepted way for international conflicts to be settled.
Part of what this means is that a huge proportion of the world's human and
material resources are diverted away from meeting human needs and into preparing
for war.
We see decisions like what is going on in Ethiopia where millions of people
are starving, when the governments of that continent are armed to the teeth
and spending millions of dollars on military hardware.
With the nuclear weapons possessed by the United States and Soviet Union,
any war can escalate into a nuclear war which would mean the end of all
of us."
"You have heard clearly that I haven't registered for the draft. To
do so would be to violate my conscience. I would like to explain some about
why I haven't registered and why I have done so openly, and at the possible
risk of five years in jail.
Throughout my life, I have learned about being a responsible person. To
me that means taking responsibility for my actions and for the effects that
those actions may have on other people and the world around me. I have tried
to live responsibly. I grew up in a house where I was encouraged to think
for myself, to make my own decisions. What that meant was that in school
I tried to prevent an unpopular teacher from being thrown out. I was involved
in activities in the community of helping to start a youth center and various
other projects.
I believe that all of these were a part of trying to live responsibly and
to take control of my own life.
I believe that refusing to register and being open about that fact is the
most responsible way for me to respond to the registration law. I felt that
it was important for me to publicly state that I hadn't registered because
I believe in honesty. I believe that if my actions are designed to try and
stop war, as they are, that I must talk with people even if that means that
I end up in a court like this, and risk going to jail. I certainly could
have chosen to be quiet about my decision; to be among the half-million
people who haven't registered and have been quiet about that. That didn't
sit well with my conscience.
Refusing to register is a very personal decision. I don't claim that it
is what everyone should do or that it is the only way to help create a more
peaceful world; there are other things to do, and I try and partake in many
of them. But the government required that I fill out a card in case they
wanted to send me to war. Filling out that card is very symbolic, it means
my participation in preparation for war.
Not only do I believe that I cannot, in good conscience, fill out that card;
but under the Nuremberg Accords, that I have a responsibility not to do
so.
I believe that the government's ability to wage wars around the world depends
on the cooperation of the people they expect to do the fighting for them.
Therefore, I will not give the government the power to tell me to kill other
people or to decide if my reasons for not wanting to kill other people are
acceptable. I cannot see a situation in which I would feel comfortable killing
another person.
I also see my actions in a social context. Wars have caused, and continue
to cause untold death and destruction in our world. Life goes on with military
force being the accepted way for international conflicts to be settled.
Part of what this means is that a huge proportion of the world's human and
material resources are diverted away from meeting human needs and into preparing
for war.
We see decisions like what is going on in Ethiopia where millions of people
are starving, when the governments of that continent are armed to the teeth
and spending millions of dollars on military hardware.
With the nuclear weapons possessed by the United States and Soviet Union,
any war can escalate into a nuclear war which would mean the end of all
of us."
"Between December of 1981 and April of 1984, the United States Government
has acknowledged spending over $70 million on these activities. The results
have included more than 1,400 Nicaraguans killed, more than 3,000 maimed,
wounded, raped or kidnapped, more than 113,000 people who have had to be
relocated as a result of violence, and over $200 million dollars of destruction
to schools, hospitals, bridges and other parts of [the] Nicaraguan economic
and social fabric. This is in a country that is very poor, that has tried
to overcome years of war, and a massive earthquake; and the money that needs
to be spent to repair fuel tanks that were destroyed in a CIA sponsored
raid, take[s] away from day-care centers, milk for children, from vitally
needed social programs."
"I have been told that I am in the wrong place, that this isn't the
place for moral and political issues to be addressed, that I should be going
to the Legislature, to the President, to other people. And we are at a time
where if we don't prevent war, it may destroy our world.
I don't claim my individual act of refusing to register will, by itself,
end war. It is a step, it is the response of a concerned person reacting
to a world which in many ways seems to be tottering at the edge.
I ask you to join me in exploring ways that we can work towards ending war.
Thank you."